NGOs challenge cosmetics companies to follow J&J in chemical phaseout

NGOs challenge cosmetics companies to follow J&J in chemical phaseout

The Campaign for Safe Cosmetics has, alongside the Breast Cancer Fund challenged five major cosmetic and personal care companies to phase-out or reduce the use of certain chemicals in their products, a move it says Johnson & Johnson has already made.

Last month, J&J announced it had set an internal target date that by the end of 2015 it will have reduced or eliminated formaldehyde releasers, certain parabens, 1,4-dioxane, triclosan, diethyl phthalate (DEP) and five fragrance chemicals from all of its products.

Meet or beat…

This campaign is homing in on Avon, Estée Lauder, L’Oréal, Procter & Gamble, and Unilever, and according to its co-founder Lisa Archer; "is a major victory for public health. We are calling on these cosmetics giants to meet or beat J&J’s commitments and signal they take consumer safety as seriously as their competitor.”

The Campaign for Safe Cosmetics says that whilst challenging these cosmetic companies it will still remain vigilant “in making sure that J&J meets its commitments and will continue to encourage it to remove other ingredients of concern.”

The Safe Cosmetics Act of 2011, currently circulating in Congress, will phase out chemicals linked to cancer and reproductive harm; implement a strong safety standard designed to protect children, pregnant women and workers; require full disclosure of ingredients; and give FDA the authority to recall dangerous products.

Cleaning up baby care

In November last year, the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics issued a public complaint putting pressure on the baby care giant having found that it had removed two potentially hazardous chemicals, 1,4-dioxane and quaternium-15, from products in many countries in Europe, Asia and Africa, but in the US, China and Canada, traces were still present.

In a letter responding to the NGO at the time, J&J CEO Bill Weldon stated that the company planned to eliminate formaldehyde-releasing preservatives, such as quaternium-15, from hundreds of its baby products in the next two years.

Weldon also stated that J&J was working with its global suppliers to reduce traces of 1,4-dioxane, considered a likely carcinogen, to <1 to 4ppm, with most now meeting this standard. He claimed the goal of this research is to find an alternative to completely remove these ingredients from formulations in the future.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Related News

J&J acquires China rival after months of speculation

J&J acquires China rival after months of speculation

Elizabeth Lascelle, senior director, Environmental, Health and Safety, Johnson & Johnson

J&J says its approach to sustainability begins with the consumer

FDA cancels J&J's cosmetics licence at Mumbai plant

FDA cancels J&J's cosmetics licence at Mumbai plant

Campaign for Safe Cosmetics reports on 'who's naughty and who’s nice'..

P&G reaches milestone with efforts to wipe phthalates from products

P&G reaches milestone with efforts to wipe phthalates from products

P&G develops gel to reduce the appearance of body hair

Avon the latest to take reformulation pledge with triclosan

Avon the latest to take reformulation pledge with triclosan

Johnson & Johnson launch Healthy Future 2015 initiative

Johnson & Johnson to remove potentially harmful chemicals from all US formulations

Johnson & Johnson baby products cleared in China

Lobby group commends J&J decision to remove harmful chemicals

Lobby group commends J&J decision to remove harmful chemicals

J&J comes under pressure over ingredients used in baby care products

J&J comes under pressure over ingredients used in baby care products

Related Products

See more related products